Letโs state a fact that everyone knows: ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต.
What about Stockly:
32% of Stocklers are women. Itโs even less in tech teams ๐ฅ
How to progress towards gender parity, then? Itโs a complex topic but let me share my humble vision about it.
First of all letโs be clear on something:
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ป๐ผ ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ผ๐บ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐๐บ ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐น๐. So it is certain that in a recruitment process for a given position, if a candidate-A performs better than a candidate-B, candidate-A should be chosen over candidate-B. Regardless of their gender. If a man performs better than a woman, the man should be selected. ๐ช๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป.
Unfortunately, we are not responsible on the fact that there is less women developers than men developers available in the worldโฆ
We are not either responsible for the recruitment in engineering schools and it wonโt be our focus to change this in the world, even though we think itโs sad - and we know these schools are doing a lot of effort already to attract more women (~20% of women at Tรฉlรฉcom Paris. ~15% at EPITA: Ecole d'Ingรฉnieurs en Informatique)
That said, to try to move towards gender parity, without discriminating anyone or being unfair:
๐ weโve always agreed with the team that if two candidates fitted a role, one man and one woman, weโd be picking the woman first to favour gender parity (and it would be the opposite if women were over-represented at Stockly).
๐ we maximise our chances of hiring women by pro-actively feeding our candidate sourcing pipeline with more female candidates to target.